Comments on: O’Reilly protecting the “Web 2.0″ name http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/ Raising The Eight Bar Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:45:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: slayt sunu http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/comment-page-1/#comment-242859 slayt sunu Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:33:32 +0000 http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/#comment-242859 <a href="http://2010sbssonucu.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">SBS</a> SBS

]]> By: chris tech http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/comment-page-1/#comment-242082 chris tech Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:29:42 +0000 http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/#comment-242082 great blog and interesting articles ive added your site to my rss reader...thanks a bunch :) great blog and interesting articles ive added your site to my rss reader…thanks a bunch :)

]]> By: Adam Capote http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/comment-page-1/#comment-241798 Adam Capote Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:53:37 +0000 http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/#comment-241798 Great post, thanks :) Great post, thanks :)

]]> By: nol http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1263 nol Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:19:15 +0000 http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/#comment-1263 ...and User Friendly has a <a href="http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20060606" rel="nofollow">response</a>. …and User Friendly has a response.

]]> By: Roo http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1125 Roo Wed, 31 May 2006 08:25:48 +0000 http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/#comment-1125 Tim is back, with a <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/05/web_20_service_mark_controvers.html" rel="nofollow">detailed response</a>. Tim is back, with a detailed response.

]]> By: Roo http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1077 Roo Sun, 28 May 2006 20:26:53 +0000 http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/#comment-1077 Update: O'Reilly's VP of communications <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/05/more_on_our_web_20_service_mar.html" rel="nofollow">has this to say</a>: "We're not claiming exclusive use of "Web 2.0" in all contexts. Our service mark applies only to "Web 2.0" when used in the *title* of "live events" such as conferences and tradeshows." Like many people, I'm waiting to hear what Tim will say about all of this when he gets back. Update: O’Reilly’s VP of communications has this to say: “We’re not claiming exclusive use of “Web 2.0″ in all contexts. Our service mark applies only to “Web 2.0″ when used in the *title* of “live events” such as conferences and tradeshows.”

Like many people, I’m waiting to hear what Tim will say about all of this when he gets back.

]]> By: Miguel http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1028 Miguel Fri, 26 May 2006 20:32:55 +0000 http://eightbar.co.uk/2006/05/26/oreilly-protecting-the-web-20-name/#comment-1028 In light of today's news, digg this one: http://www.effengud.com/web21a/index.htm In light of today’s news, digg this one:

http://www.effengud.com/web21a/index.htm

]]>